Refine your search
Collections
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Yadav, Rahul Kumar
- Project Effort Estimation using COCOMO-2 Metrics with Fuzzy Logic
Abstract Views :114 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Science, Mewar University, Gangrar, Chittorgarh – 312901, Rajasthan, IN
1 Department of Computer Science, Mewar University, Gangrar, Chittorgarh – 312901, Rajasthan, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 10, No 29 (2017), Pagination:Abstract
Objectives: Enhancement of the effort estimation by using Fuzzy Logic with COCOMO-II Effort Multiplier and comparing BRE, RE, VAF. Methods/Statistical Analysis: For the cost estimation, fuzzy logic is used with three membership functions such as Triangular, Trepezoidal and Bell. Findings: The results show that all three membership functions vary by 1-2 % in the effort estimation where as if compared; COCOMO 2 Effort varies by 5-10 % from Fuzzy output. The traditional method consumes a lot of time and a lot of methods are non mathematical due to which the predicted results may be irrelevant. Application/Improvements: The work has been tested on 5 projects. When the parameters for triangular function are executed, values for embedded 1, semidetached 2 are enhanced as compare to organic, semi detached 1, embedded 2. After the evaluation of trapezoidal function, values of semidetached 1 and embedded 1 are more as compare to others. Same as before, the values for embedded 1 and semidetached 2 are more in Bell membership function. Slight improvement has been seen in organic value. Similarly, for COCOMO II the results have been obtained.Keywords
COCOMO-II, Cost Metrics, Fuzzy Logic, Software Effort Estimation.- Performance Analysis of Rotavator and Other Tillage Implement Driven by the Tractor
Abstract Views :155 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Vaugh School of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Science, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
1 Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Vaugh School of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Science, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Engineering, Vol 10, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 590-594Abstract
Performance analysis of rotavater and other tillage implements in the field during the year 2014-15 is calculated in this research paper performance analysis of rotavator and other tillage system is calculated the field capacity, Fuel consumption, actual, theoretical speed performance index and energy requirement for preparation of seed bed with the performance of rotavator is calculated in plot with area of 60 x 20 m2 the combination of ploughing ploughing + cultivating, ploughing + disc harrowing, ploughing + Rotavating, Single operation of rotavator and double operation of rotavator with speed of 5.21 km/h gave the highest performance index 83.34% and energy consumption was 586.73 MJ/h in this field area rotavator performance index is 25.75 and energy consumption 761.6 MJ/ha, respectively.Keywords
Mean Weight Diameter, Fuel Consumption, Energy Requirement.References
- Adewoyin, A.O. and Ajav, E.A. (2013). Fuel consumption of some tractor models for ploughing operation in the sandy-loam soil of Nigeria at various speeds and ploughing depth. Agari. Engg. Internat. CIGR J., 3 : 67-74.
- A.H. Clark, R.L. (1981). Tractive and energy performance of a small four-wheel drive tractor. ASAE Paper No. 81-1042, ASAF, St. Joseph, MI 49085
- Arvindsson, J., Keller, T. and Gustafsson, K. (2004). Specific draft for mouldboard plough, chisel plough and disk harrow at different water contents. Soil & Tillage Res., 79 : 221-223.
- Bukhari, Sh. B. and Baloch, J.M. (1982). Fuel consumption of tillage implements, AMA, 13 : 20-22.
- Guruswami, T. (1986). Cultivator an efficient implement in dry land agriculture. Agric. Engg. Today, 10 (4) : 15-17.
- Triag, O. Osman and Moayad, B. (2014). Zaied and Ahmed M.E., Field performance of modified chisel plough. Internat. J. Natural Sci. Res., 6 : 85-96.
- Performance Evaluation of Happy Seeder for Sowing Wheat Crop in Combined Harvested
Abstract Views :171 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Vaugh School of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Science, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
1 Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Vaugh School of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Science, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Engineering, Vol 10, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 643-646Abstract
The present study was undertaken on happy seeder for wheat crop under ricewheat the cropping system in Allahabad region. In this study evaluate the performance of the happy seeder with conventional method and show its effectiveness over the sowing technique. The performance evaluation was done from the basis of field capacity, field efficiency, actual field capacity, fuel consumption and cost of operation, the compression of economics of operation of happy seeder with conventional method of sowing wheat in combined harvested paddy field, to prove the effectiveness. The operating speed was varying from 2.5 to 3.5 kmph to evaluate the variables. The field efficiency of happy seeder was 43.4% and 65.04% for seed drill at operating speed of 3.5 kmph. The crop residue is heavy which was collected by sampling. The cost of operating per hectare by happy seeder was Rs. 2098.65 and cost of operation per hectare by seed drill + tillage operations was Rs. 3106.38. Therefore cost of operational with happy economical as compared to seed drill by Rs. 1008.38 per hectare. But happy seeder is unique technique for sowing wheat in combine harvested paddy field. It controls the weeds also.Keywords
Happy Seeder, Rice, Wheat, Seed Drill.References
- Bmbraw, Avtar Singh, Kang, Jasjit Sing and Kaur, Maninder (2011). Happy Seeder : A Avenue for crop residue management. Research Bulletin, 1/2011. Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
- Borresen, T. (1997). The effect of straw management and shallow tillage/drilling on soil properties and crop yields on a loam and a silty loam soil in south-east Norway. Internal report, Department of Soil and Water Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway.
- Sidhu, H.S., Singh, M., Humphreys, E., Singh, Y. Singh, B., Dhillon, S.S., Blackwell, J., Bector, V., Singh, M. and Singh, S. (2007). The Happy Seeder enables direct drilling of wheat into rice straw. Australian J. Experi. Agric., 47 : 844-854.
- Singh, Y., Singh, B. and Timsina, J. (2005). Crop residue management for nutrient cycling and improving soil productivity in rice-based cropping systems in the tropics. Adv. Agron., 85 : 269-407.
- Performance and Evaluation of Laser Land Leveler with Conventional Method in Allahabad
Abstract Views :633 |
PDF Views:4
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Vaugh School of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Science, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
2 Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Vaugh School of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Science, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
1 Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Vaugh School of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Science, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
2 Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Vaugh School of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Science, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
Source
Engineering and Technology in India, Vol 8, No 1-2 (2017), Pagination: 35-38Abstract
Land development is the prime components of precision forming. Unevenness of fields leads to in sufficient use of irrigation water. The present study was conducted to evaluate the performance of laser land with conventional method was conducted at Champatpur in Allahabad region. The performance evaluation was done on the basis of actual field capacity, field efficiency, fuel consumption, cost of operation and leveling index with that of conventional method to prove the effectiveness. The operating average speed was varying from 1.5 to 2.50 kmph to evaluate the variables. A comparative evaluation of the laser land leveler with conventional method of leveling showed that the percentage reduction in standard deviation of reduced level, before and after leveling was 85.7 per cent for laser leveler and 46.79 per cent for conventional method, which was 38.91 per cent lower than the laser leveler. From the results of contours analysis, it was observe that considerably higher accuracy of grading was obtained when fields were graded by use of the laser leveler. The field capacity cost of operation for lesar leveler were 0.126 ha/h and Rs. 804.20 ha-1, respectively i.e. they were 0.18 ha/h and Rs. 690.24 for conventional leveler, respectively. The cost of leveling per hectare was Rs. 6382.57 and Rs. 3834.67 for laser leveler and conventional leveling.Keywords
Performance, Evaluation, Laser Land Leveler, Conventional Method.References
- Anuraja, B., Kanannavar, P.S., Balakrishnan, P., Pujari, B.T. and Hadimani, M.B. (2013). Laser guided land leveler for precision land development. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci.,26 (2): 271-275.
- Chaudhari, D., Mathankar, M.B., Singh, V.V. and Shirsat, N.A. (2005). Performance evaluation of laser guided land leveler for land grading in vertisols of central India. Paper presented in the 39th Annual convention of ISAE held at Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad during 9-11 March, 2005.
- Cook, R.L. and Peikert, F.W. (1960). A comparison of tillage implement. J. American Soci. Agric. Engineers, 31 : 221-214.
- El-Guindy, A.A., Hasan- El, M.A, Sayd, G. and El-Banna, Osman (1994). Effect of precision land leveling system on wheat and maize production. Paper presented at 2nd Int. Conference on laser and applications, 16-19 September, Cairo, Egypt.